Who knew? Reality is ….

One of the more interesting areas of research that is currently attracting absolutely no interest at all from the scientific community is the ontological relationship between inner consciousness – as opposed to outer consciousness – and the effect on the growth rate of nasal hair while  travelling on the underground from Kings Cross to Waterloo on Mondays just before tea time.

This highly specialized branch of  metaphysical bioluminescent involves neo-fractal vibrational modality and measuring thaumatic resonance of a Mandelbrot set viewed through two holes cut out of  a Thorgerson and Hipgnosis designed vinyl record cover.

Optional extras can include: Gospel of Matthew but only verses 9 and 42, Sugar lumps (no more than three), a copy of the Radio Times from 1967, and one of Nelson Mandela’s socks, 

It is not certain if or when results will be published but whatever the outcome it is sure to cause ripples in the space time continuum ..mum …um.

Ark.

 

 

 


38 thoughts on “Who knew? Reality is ….

      1. Ah! I dare say they don’t really believe much of what they preach if they get offended by such parody! I should know, right? This stuff was once/still is right up my alley. However, if you can’t let a thing go, then maybe you never really had it! Lol.

        Liked by 2 people

          1. Haha! I absolutely agree. I always thought it was a daft analogy anyway. All it ever did was demonstrate the asinine logic of those who think they are intelligent. In order to think outside of the box, you have to be prepared to recognise that you’re in a box to begin with, and that the box is not an absolute. That’s the fundamental mistake nearly everyone makes. The box is never what you think it is! 🙂

            Liked by 1 person

          2. The only way, as far as I can tell, to reveal why so many woo-meisters – from the religious to the ‘enlightened’ – peddle QM (quantum mechanics) as the handmaiden of their bullshit is to demonstrate that the woo-meisters don’t have the first clue what QM actually is or what it actually reveals. It’s a cherrypicked tactic to reference QM because QM is not well understood by most of the audience. And so the ‘mysteriousness’ is used as a disguise to excuse the ‘mysteriousness’ (aka a claim about reality that has no compelling evidence from reality to back it up) of the woo. It takes effort to understand QM and, like so much bullshit from the religious crowd, the tactic takes way more effort to dismantle why it doesn’t support the woo claim than it does to simply go along to get along. This is what the users of the tactic rely on, that to confront and challenge their bullshit claims about reality reveals something about the criticizer rather than deal with the absence of evidence for the claim… you know the list: hater, rude, bad tone, egotistical, arrogant, harsh, confrontational, tl;dr, generally a person with questionable morals, yada, yada, yada, and – sure enough – many of those who should be on board with insisting that claims about reality be informed by evidence from reality become the infamous ‘butters’… as in, I don’t believe the woo bullshit either, but (generally, I’m such a nicer person than THAT person)… in order to separate their good character from the questionable character of the criticizer. You know the drill.

            Liked by 2 people

  1. Hmmmm, as the fine brilliant theoretical physicist once stated about Entanglement, or perhaps debate and heated argument…

    It all appears as “spooky action at a distance.

    However, over the last few decades science and physics, and new Quantum Physics has demonstrated that the reality of “spooky actions” over vast distances such as light-years is indeed true, a provable reality. 🙂

    I am aware of what and whom you reference here. It is my hope that cooler heads prevail and that very open-mindedness remains close rather than distant or closed off. I thoroughly enjoy BOTH of your brains and hope that like John Adams and Thomas Jefferson… a challenging yet a gentlemanly respect can be maintained. Differences are not always a detriment or liability.

    That is all I wish to say on the matter. 😁

    Liked by 1 person

      1. 😄 Nah, I’m taking all that on the chin and learning from it. 😉 I need to learn that sometimes/often… less is more. It’s a humbling lesson my Friend. I need to try and do/be better as hard as that might seem to be from someone of my stature. 🤣

        Perhaps I need to be reminded that as a very good goalkeeper, I need to accept and appreciate when I’ve been well beaten up in the top corners or exquisitely, delicately chipped over my head when I come out and cut the angles. I do have my limitations and there’s nothing wrong with the opposition scoring 3-4 superb goals in my net. 😉

        And I mean all that footballing stuff strictly on myself, no one else.

        Like

        1. Editor’s Tip For Free: You could have stopped after the first sentence. I got the point.

          The next Editor’s Tip I will definitely bill you.

          Liked by 2 people

          1. Depending on how much time you have left alive on this planet…

            yeah, check my word-count first. You might have many more important things to do BEFORE being lowered 6-feet under the daisies. 😛 Like check on the growth/health of your Passiflora Quadrangularis Erotica. You know, sizing up what’s going on in your fabulous garden, what fertilizers to spread or cut-out, how to HANG the vines for the most volume… basically how to manage all the life, animals, and insects in your Garden of Eden. 😈

            Liked by 1 person

  2. I think the scientific community’s disinterest in nasal hair research reeks of severe apathy. In fact, even a simple inquiry concerning recent developments in this field of study are met with a stern rebukes to stop asking them such cilia questions.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. It is tres enlightening. While it doesn’t allow me to see the Matrix, I did see the photonic fluctuations of my Granddad’s aura at the foot of my bed the other night and he was singing Purple Haze by Jimi Hendrix in a Cornish accent.
      Was a very spiritual experience.
      I was moved to get out of bed and go for a pee.

      Like

    1. I hope you lit a pan of eucalyptus leaves, various herbs, the left back leg of an Amazon tree frog( died of nat’ral causes such as a brick accidentally falling on it) and sandalwood incense, delicately wafting the pungent smoke all around and over yourself before you brought water anywhere near your aura?

      Liked by 1 person

    1. Any colour is okay, but here’s the catch … they must be the special edition socks with the print of FW de Klerk’s face on them.
      Try ebay?

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s